The '1031 Exchange' or the 'Like-Kind Exchange' is a provision outlined in the 26 U.S. Code § 1031 that has a history dating back almost a century. Initially established as a means for farmers to comprehend land boundaries, the code now serves as a tool for investors to defer capital gains taxes on real estate investments. By permitting the exchange of a property into other like-kind investments, the 1031 Exchange offers a means to defer tax implications.
The Qualified Opportunity Zone Program (QOZP) was introduced as a component of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 with the goal of promoting investment in lower-income communities by offering tax benefits for capital gains generated from asset sales. While both the 1031 Exchange and the QOZP provide tax deferral for asset sales, they differ significantly in their objectives and requirements.
Therefore, it is not possible to utilize the 1031 Exchange to invest in a Qualified Opportunity Zone. This is because the 1031 Exchange requires a like-kind exchange between assets, and exchanging real estate property for a Qualified Opportunity Fund does not fit the definition of like-kind. Furthermore, the significant disparities between the two programs make a direct exchange from one to the other challenging to achieve.
Upon a more in-depth analysis, it becomes clear that there are several significant differences that make exchanging real property for a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) not feasible.
Qls vs. QOFs. One of the key differences is the treatment of gains and forward rolls. In a Qualified Opportunity Zone investment, the investor places their capital gains into the fund, whereas with a 1031 Exchange, the investor must retain their original investment, capital gains, and debt. On the other hand, in a QOZ investment, the investor has the freedom to retain their original basis and use it as they see fit.
These differences highlight the distinct nature of the two programs and why it is not possible to directly exchange real property for a Qualified Opportunity Fund.
Timelines and Deadlines. Another key difference between the two programs lies in the timelines and deadlines involved. Although both programs have deadlines, they are significantly different.
In the case of a 1031 Exchange, the investor has a 45-day window to identify a replacement property and must complete the like-kind exchange within 180 days. On the other hand, a QOZ investor must invest their gains into a Qualified Opportunity Fund within 180 days.
However, if an investor is unable to find an appropriate like-kind property within the 45-day deadline for the 1031 Exchange, they may still invest the capital gains from the asset sale into a Qualified Opportunity Zone as long as they do so within the 180-day window for realizing the gains.
Holding Periods and Step-Ups. Another key aspect to consider is the difference in step-ups and holding periods between the two programs. Qualified Opportunity Zone investments often come with a tax advantage that is tied to a specific timeline.
Specifically, if an investor holds their investment in a Qualified Opportunity Fund for a minimum of 10 years, they will not be taxed on the portion of the property gain generated by the fund. This is because the investor will receive a step-up in basis on the property, effectively increasing it to the fair-market value.
This feature is unique to the Qualified Opportunity Zone Program and highlights the advantages that can be gained through investing in a Qualified Opportunity Fund. The ability to receive a step-up in basis and avoid paying taxes on the portion of the property gain further underscores the difference between the 1031 Exchange and the Qualified Opportunity Zone Program.
Both the 1031 Exchange and the Qualified Opportunity Zone Program provide tax-deferral benefits to investors, but they differ greatly in terms of their purposes and requirements. As a result, exchanging real estate property directly into a Qualified Opportunity Fund is not feasible. It would be an unfair comparison to attempt to compare these two distinct investment opportunities.
It's important to note that neither program is inherently better than the other. The most suitable option for an investor will depend on factors such as their portfolio structure, timing, and investment goals. The key is to have a clear understanding of the distinct differences between these programs, so that investors can make informed decisions that align with their investment objectives.
Investing in Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) properties and real estate securities is not without its challenges and hazards. These investments are vulnerable to various risks, including reduced liquidity, empty rental units, fluctuations in market conditions and competition, lack of historical performance, fluctuations in interest rates, the threat of new market entrants causing a decline in rental prices, risks associated with owning and managing commercial and multi-family properties, short-term leases in multi-family properties, financing risks, potential tax implications, general economic uncertainties, development-related risks, extended holding periods, and the possibility of losing all of the invested principal.
Not an offer to buy, nor a solicitation to sell securities. All investing involves risk of loss of some or all principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Speak to your finance and/or tax professional prior to investing. Any information provided is for informational purposes only.
Securities offered through Emerson Equity LLC Member: FINRA/SIPC. Only available in states where Emerson Equity LLC is registered. Emerson Equity LLC is not affiliated with any other entities identified in this communication.
1031 Risk Disclosure:
Opportunity Zone Disclosures:
Perch Financial LLC and Emerson Equity LLC do not provide legal or tax advice. Securities offered through Emerson Equity LLC Member FINRA/SIPC and MSRB registered. Emerson Equity LLC is unaffiliated with any entity herein. 1031 Risk Disclosure:
No offer to buy or sell securities is being made. Such offers may only be made to qualified accredited investors via private placement memorandum. Risks detailed in a private placement memorandum should be carefully reviewed, understood, and considered before making such an investment. Prospective strategies and products used in any tax advantaged investment planning should be reviewed independently with your tax and legal advisors. Changes to the tax code and other regulatory revisions could have a negative impact upon strategies developed and recommendations made. Past performance and/or forward-looking statements are never an assurance of future results.
Many of the investments offered will be only available to those investors meeting the definition of an Accredited Investor under SEC Rule 501(A) and offered as Regulation D private placement securities via a Private Placement Memorandum (“PPM”). Prospective investors must receive, read, and understand all the risks associated with buying private placement securities. Investments are not guaranteed or FDIC insured and risks may include but are not limited to illiquidity, no guarantee of income or guarantee that all tax advantages or objectives will be met and complete loss of principal investment could occur.
Risk Disclosure: Alternative investment products, including real estate investments, notes & debentures, hedge funds and private equity, involve a high degree of risk, often engage in leveraging and other speculative investment practices that may increase the risk of investment loss, can be highly illiquid, are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuation information to investors, may involve complex tax structures and delays in distributing important tax information, are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as mutual funds, often charge high fees which may offset any trading profits, and in many cases the underlying investments are not transparent and are known only to the investment manager. Alternative investment performance can be volatile. An investor could lose all or a substantial amount of his or her investment. Often, alternative investment fund and account managers have total trading authority over their funds or accounts; the use of a single advisor applying generally similar trading programs could mean lack of diversification and, consequently, higher risk. There is often no secondary market for an investor's interest in alternative investments, and none is expected to develop. There may be restrictions on transferring interests in any alternative investment. Alternative investment products often execute a substantial portion of their trades on non-U.S. exchanges. Investing in foreign markets may entail risks that differ from those associated with investments in U.S. markets. Additionally, alternative investments often entail commodity trading, which involves substantial risk of loss.
NO OFFER OR SOLICITATION: The contents of this website: (i) do not constitute an offer of securities or a solicitation of an offer to buy of securities, and (ii) may not be relied upon in making an investment decision related to any investment offering by Perch Financial LLC, Emerson Equity LLC, or any affiliate, or partner thereof. Perch Financial LLC does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein.
Leave a Reply