Is a 1031 Exchange Allowed into a Qualified Opportunity Zone?

The '1031 Exchange' or the 'Like-Kind Exchange' is a provision outlined in the 26 U.S. Code § 1031 that has a history dating back almost a century. Initially established as a means for farmers to comprehend land boundaries, the code now serves as a tool for investors to defer capital gains taxes on real estate investments. By permitting the exchange of a property into other like-kind investments, the 1031 Exchange offers a means to defer tax implications.

The Qualified Opportunity Zone Program (QOZP) was introduced as a component of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 with the goal of promoting investment in lower-income communities by offering tax benefits for capital gains generated from asset sales. While both the 1031 Exchange and the QOZP provide tax deferral for asset sales, they differ significantly in their objectives and requirements.

Therefore, it is not possible to utilize the 1031 Exchange to invest in a Qualified Opportunity Zone. This is because the 1031 Exchange requires a like-kind exchange between assets, and exchanging real estate property for a Qualified Opportunity Fund does not fit the definition of like-kind. Furthermore, the significant disparities between the two programs make a direct exchange from one to the other challenging to achieve.

Major Differences

Upon a more in-depth analysis, it becomes clear that there are several significant differences that make exchanging real property for a Qualified Opportunity Fund (QOF) not feasible.

Qls vs. QOFs. One of the key differences is the treatment of gains and forward rolls. In a Qualified Opportunity Zone investment, the investor places their capital gains into the fund, whereas with a 1031 Exchange, the investor must retain their original investment, capital gains, and debt. On the other hand, in a QOZ investment, the investor has the freedom to retain their original basis and use it as they see fit.

These differences highlight the distinct nature of the two programs and why it is not possible to directly exchange real property for a Qualified Opportunity Fund.


Timelines and Deadlines. Another key difference between the two programs lies in the timelines and deadlines involved. Although both programs have deadlines, they are significantly different.

In the case of a 1031 Exchange, the investor has a 45-day window to identify a replacement property and must complete the like-kind exchange within 180 days. On the other hand, a QOZ investor must invest their gains into a Qualified Opportunity Fund within 180 days.

However, if an investor is unable to find an appropriate like-kind property within the 45-day deadline for the 1031 Exchange, they may still invest the capital gains from the asset sale into a Qualified Opportunity Zone as long as they do so within the 180-day window for realizing the gains.

Holding Periods and Step-Ups. Another key aspect to consider is the difference in step-ups and holding periods between the two programs. Qualified Opportunity Zone investments often come with a tax advantage that is tied to a specific timeline.

Specifically, if an investor holds their investment in a Qualified Opportunity Fund for a minimum of 10 years, they will not be taxed on the portion of the property gain generated by the fund. This is because the investor will receive a step-up in basis on the property, effectively increasing it to the fair-market value.

This feature is unique to the Qualified Opportunity Zone Program and highlights the advantages that can be gained through investing in a Qualified Opportunity Fund. The ability to receive a step-up in basis and avoid paying taxes on the portion of the property gain further underscores the difference between the 1031 Exchange and the Qualified Opportunity Zone Program.

Clear Your Investment Path: Understanding Your Target Investment

Both the 1031 Exchange and the Qualified Opportunity Zone Program provide tax-deferral benefits to investors, but they differ greatly in terms of their purposes and requirements. As a result, exchanging real estate property directly into a Qualified Opportunity Fund is not feasible. It would be an unfair comparison to attempt to compare these two distinct investment opportunities.

It's important to note that neither program is inherently better than the other. The most suitable option for an investor will depend on factors such as their portfolio structure, timing, and investment goals. The key is to have a clear understanding of the distinct differences between these programs, so that investors can make informed decisions that align with their investment objectives.

Investing in Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) properties and real estate securities is not without its challenges and hazards. These investments are vulnerable to various risks, including reduced liquidity, empty rental units, fluctuations in market conditions and competition, lack of historical performance, fluctuations in interest rates, the threat of new market entrants causing a decline in rental prices, risks associated with owning and managing commercial and multi-family properties, short-term leases in multi-family properties, financing risks, potential tax implications, general economic uncertainties, development-related risks, extended holding periods, and the possibility of losing all of the invested principal.

General Disclosure

Not an offer to buy, nor a solicitation to sell securities. All investing involves risk of loss of some or all principal invested. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Speak to your finance and/or tax professional prior to investing. Any information provided is for informational purposes only.

Securities offered through Emerson Equity LLC Member: FINRA/SIPC. Only available in states where Emerson Equity LLC is registered. Emerson Equity LLC is not affiliated with any other entities identified in this communication.

1031 Risk Disclosure:

Opportunity Zone Disclosures: